Configure the requirements
Choose review models, submission-file requirements, declarations and optional fields at journal level.
ExploreSCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, CONNECTED
Journal & book publishing.
From submission to discovery.
Bring your authors, editors and reviewers together with configurable workflows and a publishing identity that stays yours.
Already part of the community? Visit supportLESS FRAGMENTATION. MORE FORWARD MOTION.
Give your publishing team a shared record of the work, from submission requirements to the final published article.
From a complete submission to a clear editorial decision.
02Invitations, reviewer files, reminders and revision rounds.
03Branded websites, searchable archives and Online First.
04Chapters, production, digital assets and metadata exports.
05Understand workload, publication output and portfolio trends.
06Plan archive migration, configuration and team onboarding.
ONE MANUSCRIPT. A CONNECTED JOURNEY.
Complete files, author details and declarations.
Invite reviewers and follow every response.
Bring reports, revisions and judgement together.
Coordinate copyediting, typesetting and proofs.
Release Online First and build your next issue.
PUBLISHING IN PRACTICE
EVERY ROLE, CONSIDERED
Connected workspaces for the people behind every manuscript.
EDITORS WORKSPACE
Coordinate initial checks, section editors and review rounds from a connected manuscript record.
Read the editors guideCONFIGURABLE BY DESIGN
Choose review models, submission-file requirements, declarations and optional fields at journal level.
ExploreDelegate selected manuscripts to section editors while retaining final editorial decision authority.
ExploreBring declarations, similarity reports and AI-assisted assessments into the manuscript record. AI supports editorial judgement; it does not replace it.
ExploreReview confidentiality starts with the right file. Editors select what reviewers receive. Double-blind review still requires editorial checks of the document, attachments and identifying metadata.
CONNECTED TO THE SCHOLARLY RECORD
Tools for identifiers, structured metadata and preservation exports.
Availability depends on configuration and provider requirements. Integrations do not imply endorsement or indexing acceptance.
A CLEAR START
Launching a journal or moving an archive? Start with the way you publish.
Plan your migrationReview your journals, archives and priorities.
Agree workflows, roles, branding and migration scope.
Validate the experience and prepare your team.
BEFORE WE BEGIN
Yes. Journals can retain their own identity and domain, with content managed through the publisher workspace.
Yes. Journals can configure single-blind, double-blind or open review. Editors control which file is shared.
We assess metadata, issue structure and files, and agree a migration scope before starting.
Reviewers can respond to a secure invitation and create their account after accepting.
Contact us with your journals, team size and integration requirements to discuss a suitable plan.
YOUR NEXT CHAPTER
Let's build a clearer path from submission to publication.